WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.880 --> 00:00:03.160
The topics and opinions expressed on the following show are
2
00:00:03.160 --> 00:00:05.080
solely those of the hosts and their guests and not
3
00:00:05.120 --> 00:00:08.039
those of W four WN Radio. It's employees are affiliates.
4
00:00:08.160 --> 00:00:11.720
We make no recommendations or endorsement for radio show programs, services,
5
00:00:11.800 --> 00:00:14.839
or products mentioned on air or on our web. No liability,
6
00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:17.800
explicit or implied shall be extended to W four WN
7
00:00:17.879 --> 00:00:20.960
Radio It's employees or affiliates. Any questions or common should
8
00:00:20.960 --> 00:00:23.199
be directed to those show hosts. Thank you for choosing
9
00:00:23.320 --> 00:00:25.079
W four WN Radio.
10
00:00:26.559 --> 00:00:29.559
This is Beyond Confidence with your host d W Park.
11
00:00:29.920 --> 00:00:32.039
Do you want to live a more fulfilling life? Do
12
00:00:32.079 --> 00:00:35.079
you want to live your legacy and achieve your personal, professional,
13
00:00:35.200 --> 00:00:39.359
and financial goals? Well? Coming up on Dvparks Beyond Confidence,
14
00:00:39.479 --> 00:00:43.000
you will hear real stories of leaders, entrepreneurs, and achievers
15
00:00:43.079 --> 00:00:46.479
who have stepped into discomfort, shattered their satus quo, and
16
00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:49.039
are living the life they want. You will learn how
17
00:00:49.039 --> 00:00:52.920
relationships are the key to achieving your aspirations and financial goals.
18
00:00:53.159 --> 00:00:55.840
Moving your career business forward does not have to happen
19
00:00:55.880 --> 00:00:58.399
at the expense of your personal or family life, or
20
00:00:58.560 --> 00:01:02.840
vice versa. Learn more at www dot gwpark dot com
21
00:01:02.920 --> 00:01:07.079
and you can connect with vants contact at gvpark dot com.
22
00:01:07.400 --> 00:01:11.200
This is beyond confidence and now here's your host. W Park.
23
00:01:12.519 --> 00:01:16.079
Good morning everyone, It's Tuesday, and of course I'm thrilled
24
00:01:16.079 --> 00:01:18.719
to be with you. It is one of the favorite
25
00:01:18.719 --> 00:01:23.079
times of my week because we get to have a
26
00:01:23.120 --> 00:01:27.480
wonderful conversations. And sometimes these conversations are hard. Sometimes these
27
00:01:27.519 --> 00:01:31.799
conversations are fun, but these are conversations that are important
28
00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:37.239
to have that nobody may be having. So I want
29
00:01:37.239 --> 00:01:39.159
to thank each in every one of you who have
30
00:01:39.280 --> 00:01:43.439
got a boox, especially in this day and age with
31
00:01:43.680 --> 00:01:47.920
AI becoming a thread and scaring so many people. So
32
00:01:48.239 --> 00:01:52.519
if you're looking to future proof your career and learn
33
00:01:52.560 --> 00:01:55.560
how to think about AI, because it's not what you think,
34
00:01:55.640 --> 00:01:58.959
it's how you think, be sure to get our book,
35
00:01:59.319 --> 00:02:04.120
The AIA and see and as you'll know, part of
36
00:02:04.159 --> 00:02:07.280
the proceeds going to Kiva dot org because it's important
37
00:02:07.280 --> 00:02:12.039
that we share the cheer with others as well. So
38
00:02:12.400 --> 00:02:16.080
let's welcome our guest. Welcome Brad, Welcome, David.
39
00:02:17.159 --> 00:02:18.360
Hey, great to be with you.
40
00:02:18.639 --> 00:02:26.400
Thanks Stevie, absolutely so. Do you recall either of you
41
00:02:26.560 --> 00:02:29.520
a moment or a person that left a positive mark
42
00:02:29.560 --> 00:02:29.800
on you.
43
00:02:32.719 --> 00:02:37.520
Boy, Where to start? There are so many if you
44
00:02:37.520 --> 00:02:41.439
you know, I'm gonna I'm just going to refer very
45
00:02:41.520 --> 00:02:45.199
quickly when it comes to this thing, this project that
46
00:02:45.400 --> 00:02:47.960
Dave Smith and I have been engaged in for all
47
00:02:47.960 --> 00:02:52.840
of these years, promoting a gender fair workplace, promoting gender
48
00:02:52.840 --> 00:02:55.879
fair relationships. I think I need to start with my
49
00:02:56.000 --> 00:03:02.319
only sibling, my sister. We had parallel has in the military.
50
00:03:02.639 --> 00:03:07.800
My sister stayed for thirty years, and I got a
51
00:03:07.840 --> 00:03:11.800
front row seat over the arc of her career, hearing
52
00:03:11.840 --> 00:03:16.360
about and observing the gendered headwinds that my sister experienced
53
00:03:16.439 --> 00:03:19.719
daily that I never did as a male who happens
54
00:03:19.719 --> 00:03:23.800
to have a similar career and similar personality style. And
55
00:03:23.840 --> 00:03:28.080
that was kind of my eye opener to gender inequity
56
00:03:28.319 --> 00:03:33.319
both in relationships at work, to opportunities both in society
57
00:03:33.360 --> 00:03:36.719
and the workplace. So I think it was that influence,
58
00:03:37.439 --> 00:03:41.039
you know, engaging with my sister, listening to her, observing her,
59
00:03:41.560 --> 00:03:44.280
that was kind of what got me started on this path.
60
00:03:45.400 --> 00:03:49.439
Yeah, very similar for me, not my sibling, but in
61
00:03:49.439 --> 00:03:53.879
this case my spouse and my partner, my wife, We
62
00:03:53.960 --> 00:03:57.680
had parallel careers and it was really a lot of
63
00:03:57.680 --> 00:04:02.439
those conversations over the dining table about the experiences we
64
00:04:02.439 --> 00:04:05.039
were having in the workplace and seeing how we had
65
00:04:05.199 --> 00:04:09.360
very different experiences, both in some of the interpersonal aspects
66
00:04:09.719 --> 00:04:13.240
of how we were perceived in the workplace, but also
67
00:04:13.319 --> 00:04:18.279
in opportunities, mentoring, just being seen as being ready for
68
00:04:18.399 --> 00:04:21.560
what's next, And a lot of that came very naturally
69
00:04:21.560 --> 00:04:23.680
to me. I didn't have to look very hard for her.
70
00:04:24.199 --> 00:04:27.480
It was often very challenging to find people who were
71
00:04:27.519 --> 00:04:29.560
willing to talk to her about her career and her
72
00:04:29.600 --> 00:04:33.040
career development. And it really opened my eyes to the
73
00:04:33.120 --> 00:04:37.560
fact that these were not necessarily just one person's experiences,
74
00:04:37.879 --> 00:04:40.519
because I went back and I talked to my own colleagues,
75
00:04:40.519 --> 00:04:43.120
my female colleagues at work, and to look at their
76
00:04:43.199 --> 00:04:46.240
experiences and also made the connection that Wow, this is
77
00:04:46.240 --> 00:04:50.120
a really systemic issue that lots of women are having,
78
00:04:50.759 --> 00:04:54.079
and it does tend to be more rampant in more
79
00:04:54.360 --> 00:04:58.720
majority male professions and occupations out there, but it's not
80
00:04:58.800 --> 00:05:01.399
peculiar to them, right, see that and lots of them
81
00:05:01.399 --> 00:05:03.600
out there. And that was the one that got me
82
00:05:03.639 --> 00:05:06.839
curious and thinking more about this and about how we
83
00:05:06.879 --> 00:05:09.879
could all be engaged in doing the work to really
84
00:05:09.920 --> 00:05:12.279
help to solve for some of the gender inequities we
85
00:05:12.319 --> 00:05:13.519
see today in the workplace.
86
00:05:15.000 --> 00:05:19.839
Absolutely, Brett, thank you for your services. And it's it's
87
00:05:20.040 --> 00:05:24.319
important that we recognized what's going on and a lot
88
00:05:24.319 --> 00:05:27.720
of things have changed as we look at the numbers.
89
00:05:28.199 --> 00:05:32.439
What was not true a few decades back, it is
90
00:05:32.480 --> 00:05:35.240
true now we are seeing a lot more women CEOs,
91
00:05:35.839 --> 00:05:39.920
more women in the workforce, and yet there is that
92
00:05:40.040 --> 00:05:45.199
gap and it's important to bridge that gap. So, David,
93
00:05:46.240 --> 00:05:51.319
what was your career like and how did you decide
94
00:05:51.319 --> 00:05:53.800
to shift from your career into this project.
95
00:05:56.319 --> 00:05:59.199
And again, I have my start in the military, and
96
00:05:59.240 --> 00:06:01.639
that was where I began to see some of the
97
00:06:01.680 --> 00:06:05.800
differences as women were being integrated more fully into the military,
98
00:06:06.480 --> 00:06:11.519
recognizing that again it wasn't necessarily equal or equitable in
99
00:06:11.560 --> 00:06:14.639
many different ways in terms of their opportunities they were
100
00:06:14.720 --> 00:06:18.000
receiving when we had that, and so one of the
101
00:06:18.000 --> 00:06:22.439
places that we thought was I think really interesting in
102
00:06:22.519 --> 00:06:24.519
terms of the research. And this is where Brad and
103
00:06:24.560 --> 00:06:27.120
I started our work together when we were collaborating and
104
00:06:27.199 --> 00:06:31.480
teaching at the US Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, and
105
00:06:31.800 --> 00:06:36.480
Brad's an expert and mentoring and career developmental relationships. And
106
00:06:37.560 --> 00:06:39.399
one of the connections we saw to my work in
107
00:06:39.439 --> 00:06:42.439
sociology around gender work and family issues was really this
108
00:06:42.519 --> 00:06:45.600
kind of the disconnect in terms of the quality and
109
00:06:45.639 --> 00:06:48.920
the access and the type of mentoring and just broader
110
00:06:49.360 --> 00:06:54.360
advocacy and sponsorship well as well for women compared to men.
111
00:06:54.600 --> 00:06:57.839
And also the fact that many cases, you know, there
112
00:06:57.879 --> 00:07:01.000
was this difference in that men don't make or sponsor
113
00:07:01.040 --> 00:07:02.879
women in the same way that they do for women,
114
00:07:03.639 --> 00:07:06.160
and when they do, they often don't do it in
115
00:07:05.560 --> 00:07:09.199
the same quality and doing it in a very loud,
116
00:07:09.319 --> 00:07:12.480
full throated way that have really speaking up for her,
117
00:07:12.600 --> 00:07:14.319
especially when she's not in the room, in the same
118
00:07:14.360 --> 00:07:16.639
way that they do for other men. And it really
119
00:07:16.639 --> 00:07:20.360
piqued their curiosity to understand more about how maybe it's
120
00:07:20.360 --> 00:07:23.959
some of these career developmental opportunities that were the roots
121
00:07:24.040 --> 00:07:25.720
and the source of some of this. So we began
122
00:07:25.879 --> 00:07:29.040
that's where we started and doing our research and moving
123
00:07:29.079 --> 00:07:32.480
towards this idea around how do we engage men and
124
00:07:32.560 --> 00:07:36.240
becoming part of the solution around creating gender equity in
125
00:07:36.279 --> 00:07:38.879
the workplace, because you know, often when we you know,
126
00:07:38.920 --> 00:07:43.279
we looked at organizations and leaders, and we see these inequities,
127
00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:45.920
like you know again, women not getting the same kind
128
00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:48.920
or the same access to mentoring as men. They often
129
00:07:48.959 --> 00:07:50.759
looked at that and said, well, we'll create a women's
130
00:07:50.800 --> 00:07:53.560
mentoring program, which is great, right because it gives a
131
00:07:53.600 --> 00:07:57.399
focus on women, but it often still sent a message
132
00:07:57.399 --> 00:07:59.759
to men that they didn't need to engage in doing
133
00:07:59.839 --> 00:08:01.839
the work. And so we needed to think about how
134
00:08:01.839 --> 00:08:04.399
do we reframe this, right, how do we begin to
135
00:08:04.480 --> 00:08:07.399
shift this this is a more systemic issue and structure
136
00:08:07.480 --> 00:08:09.800
this in a way so that men see that they
137
00:08:09.839 --> 00:08:11.680
have something in this too to be gained. And they
138
00:08:11.720 --> 00:08:13.920
have and they're part of the solution as well when
139
00:08:13.920 --> 00:08:15.360
it comes to doing this for everybody.
140
00:08:16.920 --> 00:08:18.959
David, thank you for sharing that, and thank you for
141
00:08:19.000 --> 00:08:23.199
your services. So as you and Brad that the research.
142
00:08:23.519 --> 00:08:27.040
I really like what you're sharing that making men also
143
00:08:27.079 --> 00:08:29.800
part of the solution. What are some of the findings
144
00:08:29.839 --> 00:08:30.800
that you came across.
145
00:08:32.919 --> 00:08:35.200
Well, I hope you have three hours, because we have
146
00:08:35.240 --> 00:08:38.159
a lot to share. We're going to keep it. We're
147
00:08:38.200 --> 00:08:40.720
going to keep it very brief for you, Diva. But
148
00:08:41.200 --> 00:08:43.399
some of the big things that really stood out, I
149
00:08:43.399 --> 00:08:48.240
think the way we as maybe organizational leaders for the
150
00:08:48.279 --> 00:08:53.159
last several decades have tried to approach gender fairness is
151
00:08:53.200 --> 00:08:56.159
simply not working. And here a couple ingredients. Here, we
152
00:08:56.240 --> 00:09:00.960
have made gender fairness of women's problem, meaning all of
153
00:09:00.960 --> 00:09:06.240
the obligation to change the workplace, to change inequities has
154
00:09:06.320 --> 00:09:09.759
been on the backs of women. So women's rgs, which
155
00:09:09.799 --> 00:09:15.000
are rarely funded or maybe human resources, get these siloed
156
00:09:15.039 --> 00:09:19.919
obligations to fix what's wrong in the workplace, and that's
157
00:09:19.919 --> 00:09:24.600
simply not working. Women didn't create this series of inequities
158
00:09:24.639 --> 00:09:28.279
around gender, and it's truly unfair to now expect them
159
00:09:28.360 --> 00:09:32.639
to fix it. So that messaging has suggested to men
160
00:09:33.279 --> 00:09:35.440
over and over again that this is a women's problem.
161
00:09:35.480 --> 00:09:39.080
So maybe you haven't advent or initiative in your company
162
00:09:39.679 --> 00:09:44.000
around gender, and you men see it and immediately say, well,
163
00:09:44.159 --> 00:09:46.639
that has gender or women in the title, So that
164
00:09:46.679 --> 00:09:50.639
doesn't involve me, So I don't show up, I don't engage,
165
00:09:50.720 --> 00:09:54.919
I don't think I'm invited. And then one other issue
166
00:09:55.320 --> 00:09:58.639
that came out loud and clear in our first book Athenaising,
167
00:09:59.120 --> 00:10:02.320
A lot of men are afraid. They're afraid of stepping
168
00:10:02.360 --> 00:10:05.000
in it. They're afraid of saying the wrong thing. They're
169
00:10:05.039 --> 00:10:08.840
afraid of gossip or rumors. They don't want to get
170
00:10:08.840 --> 00:10:11.399
it wrong, and they think that it's safer just to
171
00:10:11.399 --> 00:10:14.679
sit on the sideline and you know, maybe not engage
172
00:10:15.240 --> 00:10:19.039
with these talented women who are coming into their departments
173
00:10:19.120 --> 00:10:23.559
or their organizations. They say to themselves, well, women can
174
00:10:23.639 --> 00:10:27.279
mentor and sponsor those talented junior women. I don't need
175
00:10:27.320 --> 00:10:30.879
to do that. And by the way, I'm anxious about
176
00:10:30.879 --> 00:10:34.639
doing that. So I think we have not given men
177
00:10:34.679 --> 00:10:38.399
the opportunity to see what's in it for them when
178
00:10:38.399 --> 00:10:42.360
they really lean in to collaborative relationships with women, when
179
00:10:42.399 --> 00:10:47.360
they contribute to gender fairness, when they loudly sponsor women
180
00:10:47.399 --> 00:10:49.919
at work. There's a lot in this for us, and
181
00:10:49.960 --> 00:10:53.200
we can tell you more about that. But men benefit
182
00:10:53.639 --> 00:10:57.519
when they really engage in gender fair workplace.
183
00:10:58.679 --> 00:11:01.559
And those are some of the keywards. What's in it
184
00:11:01.600 --> 00:11:04.200
for them? What's in it for me? Especially in this
185
00:11:04.360 --> 00:11:07.519
day and age. Yeah, so we'd love to hear your
186
00:11:07.519 --> 00:11:11.279
thoughts as to how can men benefit, because when they
187
00:11:11.320 --> 00:11:14.399
are also benefiting, then it becomes a women situation rather
188
00:11:14.480 --> 00:11:18.320
than creating that gap that oh, this is not my problem.
189
00:11:19.159 --> 00:11:23.519
Yeah, yeah, maybe we could start with the area around caregiving,
190
00:11:23.519 --> 00:11:26.600
because this is one of those around traditional gender roles.
191
00:11:26.679 --> 00:11:28.840
That is one of the challenges that that men and
192
00:11:28.879 --> 00:11:31.080
women both face in the workplace. And so as we
193
00:11:31.120 --> 00:11:35.960
think about benefiting and the opportunity to make the workplace
194
00:11:36.039 --> 00:11:39.519
more fair and to facilitate, you know, getting what I
195
00:11:39.600 --> 00:11:41.879
want and what and what she wants at the same time,
196
00:11:41.919 --> 00:11:43.399
I think this is a place where we can all
197
00:11:43.440 --> 00:11:46.799
win when it comes to that, including the organization, including
198
00:11:47.080 --> 00:11:51.039
the workplace, the employer. And so again, these these notions
199
00:11:51.080 --> 00:11:54.360
that that women are somehow the innate caregivers and the
200
00:11:54.480 --> 00:12:00.440
and the default caregivers and any relationship really hinders women's
201
00:12:00.480 --> 00:12:03.879
ability to move forward in their careers, move forward as
202
00:12:03.960 --> 00:12:08.639
leaders seek opportunities when there's perceptions by men and other
203
00:12:08.639 --> 00:12:12.720
people in the in their organization that somehow they're a risk,
204
00:12:12.919 --> 00:12:15.360
or they're they're not as committed to the work, or
205
00:12:15.360 --> 00:12:17.639
they're going to leave at some point, or they're they're
206
00:12:17.639 --> 00:12:20.159
just not able to commit to the same quality and
207
00:12:20.279 --> 00:12:23.000
level of the work as men are, and so they
208
00:12:23.039 --> 00:12:25.840
don't right, so they don't get the opportunities. They are
209
00:12:25.840 --> 00:12:28.279
not put in the positions where they can do these things,
210
00:12:28.279 --> 00:12:31.039
and so this, this hinders women's ability to do that.
211
00:12:31.559 --> 00:12:33.799
The flip side of that coin is that there's an assumption,
212
00:12:33.919 --> 00:12:37.279
right from a gender roles perspective, around traditional gender roles,
213
00:12:37.320 --> 00:12:42.120
that men are somehow not innate caregivers, are not good
214
00:12:42.159 --> 00:12:45.559
at caregiving or the again, the stereotypes that go with
215
00:12:45.600 --> 00:12:49.240
that around these bumbling men who who can't seem to
216
00:12:49.240 --> 00:12:52.759
find their way around to how to take take care
217
00:12:52.799 --> 00:12:56.440
of others, whether they're small children or somebody older in
218
00:12:56.480 --> 00:13:00.799
their family. Maybe, but men can and men do want
219
00:13:00.840 --> 00:13:03.480
to do that. And that's the challenge is that when
220
00:13:03.480 --> 00:13:06.799
men try to step into caregiving roles or to do
221
00:13:06.879 --> 00:13:09.279
more of that, to take maybe take some time off
222
00:13:09.360 --> 00:13:12.840
or paid leave or use flexible work arrangements to be
223
00:13:12.919 --> 00:13:16.960
able to facilitate doing some of that caregiving, they're penalized.
224
00:13:17.120 --> 00:13:20.960
And sometimes it's very explicitly and other times it's implied
225
00:13:21.559 --> 00:13:25.399
in terms of maybe their manager asking him it's like, oh, well,
226
00:13:25.480 --> 00:13:27.519
you know, why do you need paid leave? Don't you
227
00:13:27.559 --> 00:13:31.200
have a wife? And it's like, WHOA really is that
228
00:13:31.240 --> 00:13:33.879
where we're going to go with this, But this, you know,
229
00:13:34.039 --> 00:13:36.320
these expectations that men are going to be penalized and
230
00:13:36.360 --> 00:13:39.279
they are in many ways. They're stigmatized and penalized for
231
00:13:39.919 --> 00:13:47.039
trying to use programs or policies practices that enable them
232
00:13:47.120 --> 00:13:49.879
to be the caregivers that they need to be. That
233
00:13:50.000 --> 00:13:53.000
also help us to facilitate women stepping in and leaning
234
00:13:53.000 --> 00:13:55.559
into those roles where they're not doing the lion's share
235
00:13:56.000 --> 00:13:58.200
of the caregiving. And we haven't even gotten to the
236
00:13:58.200 --> 00:14:00.440
domestic labor and the mental load that goes with all
237
00:14:00.480 --> 00:14:01.240
of that as well.
238
00:14:02.159 --> 00:14:04.840
Yeah, and two other benefits, Diva that you know you
239
00:14:04.919 --> 00:14:07.039
mentioned the with them, what's in it for men? Two
240
00:14:07.039 --> 00:14:10.360
other things. Lots of research now showing that when men
241
00:14:10.480 --> 00:14:14.360
lean into caregiving at home and share it equitably, they
242
00:14:14.399 --> 00:14:18.840
have healthier brains. You know, they have younger looking brains.
243
00:14:18.919 --> 00:14:22.440
Caregiving tends to stimulate areas in the brain that are